The federal government is weighing a return to a stricter cashless policy as part of its response to the growing wave of kidnappings and other violent crimes spreading across different parts of the country. The idea is being discussed behind closed doors alongside tougher military operations and intelligence work meant to break up the networks that carry out abductions and live off ransom money.
People familiar with the discussions say the main goal is to choke off the money that keeps these criminal groups running. Cash has become the kidnapper’s favorite tool because it leaves no trail. Once money moves through banks or electronic channels, it can be traced, flagged, and followed. But when ransoms are paid in physical cash, the trail goes cold almost immediately. That anonymity makes it easier for gangs to collect large sums, split the money, and move it around without raising any red flags. A revived cashless framework would force more transactions into the open, giving security agencies and financial investigators a better chance to connect the dots and spot suspicious activity before it turns into another attack.
Security officials believe that limiting cash will also improve the quality of intelligence they can gather. If most payments have to go through digital platforms, then patterns start to emerge. Sudden large transfers, accounts that only activate during ransom negotiations, or money moving through multiple small wallets can all be tracked. That kind of visibility is missing when bags of cash change hands in forests and remote villages.
Experts who follow Nigeria’s security situation say kidnapping for ransom has become one of the most urgent threats facing communities right now. The targets have expanded beyond what people expect. It’s no longer just wealthy individuals or politicians. Commuters on highways, farmers working their land, students in boarding schools, traditional rulers, and families in rural settlements are all being hit. The common thread is that cash makes these crimes easier to commit and harder to solve.
Some analysts see the proposed cashless push as a step in the right direction because it aligns with the broader need to modernize how money moves in the country. Electronic payments leave records. Those records can be used in court, they can help identify accomplices, and they can disrupt the financial side of criminal operations even if the gangs themselves are difficult to reach physically. But the same experts also warn that policy alone won’t fix the problem. For a cashless system to work against kidnappers, the digital infrastructure has to be reliable. People in rural areas need access to banks, mobile money agents, and networks that don’t fail when they’re needed most. Without public trust in those systems, communities may resist, and criminals will simply find another way around the rules.
There’s also the question of inclusion. If banking services don’t reach every village, then a sudden crackdown on cash could hurt ordinary citizens more than it hurts the gangs. Financial inclusion, better network coverage, and stronger enforcement will all have to move together if the policy is going to make a real difference.
While these policy conversations continue, there’s cautious hope around the case of 39 schoolchildren and seven teachers taken from Oriire Local Government Area in Oyo State. Armed men attacked Baptist Nursery and Primary School in Yawota and two other nearby schools on May 15, 2026. Since then, security forces have been tightening their presence around a section of the National Park forest where the captives are believed to be held. Troops and other agencies have been blocking escape routes and putting pressure on the kidnappers’ movement.
Officials describe the operation as being in a critical phase. The pressure on the group has reportedly increased to the point where they’re struggling to reposition. Intelligence suggests the abductors have grown desperate, and the killing of one teacher is being treated as an attempt to intimidate the government into concessions. Their initial demands included the release of detained associates and payment of ransom, but the intensity of the security response appears to have forced them to soften some of those conditions.
Reports have connected the attack to elements linked with Jama’atu Ansarul Muslimeena Fi Biladis Sudan, also known as Ansaru, a group with ties to insurgent activity in the north. Security officials remain optimistic that sustained pressure will break the network behind the abductions and lead to the safe return of everyone still in captivity. The message from authorities is clear: criminal groups should expect no safe haven anywhere in the country as operations continue.